The Concept of Mutuality in Art and Design Practices

Nazina Shaari, Mingrun Wang

Abstract

The art and design practices need to access the personal, professional, and the often tacit experience and knowledge of artists and designers. Mutuality is an important concept in art and design, as it encourages a deeper understanding of the creative process and allows for a more collaborative approach to the creation of art. It is a way of working that encourages creativity and exploration, and fosters an environment of mutual respect and understanding between those involved. Since the application of mutuality theory requires effective exchange of ideas among all participants, a collaborative approach is very important for the application of mutuality theory because the effectiveness of collaborative approaches will directly affect mutual outcomes of participants. Nowadays, the art environment has become more dynamic and hypercompetitive due to the development of the digital economy and the artistic cultivation of audiences. This has led to the collaborative approaches developed in the past not adapting to the requirements of modern art design well. To fulfil this research gap, this study aims to enrich a collaborative approach that can integrate modern design thinking for the application of mutuality theory in art and design practices. The research method involved in this study is literature research, it reconstructed the collaborative approach by referencing advanced research results. Finally, a KJ method for mutuality theory application in art and design practices was developed. Furthermore, the research findings can offer some guidance and inspiration for the artists and designers to update their design thinking.

Full Text:

PDF

References

K. Niedderer, L. Reilly, Research practice in art and design: Experiential knowledge and organised inquiry. Journal of Research Practice, 2010, 6(2), E2-E2. DOI: https://jrp.icaap.org/index.php/jrp/ article/view/247

A. A. Webster, M. Carter, Mutual liking, enjoyment, and shared interactions in the closest relationships between children with developmental disabilities and peers in inclusive school settings. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 2013, 25, pp. 373-393. DOI: https://doi.org/10.10 07/s10882-012-9319-8.

R. H. Henson, Analysis of the concept of mutuality. Image: The Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 1997, 29(1), pp. 77-81. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1547- 5069.1997.tb01144.x

R. Scupin, The KJ method: A technique for analyzing data derived from Japanese ethnology. Human organization, 1997, 56(2), pp. 233-237. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17730/humo.56.2.x335923 511444655

A. M. Lokman, S. A. Kadir, F. Noordin, S. H. Shariff, Modeling Factors and Importance of Happiness Using KJ Method. In: Lokman, A., Yamanaka, T., Lévy, P., Chen, K., Koyama, S. (eds) Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Kansei Engineering and Emotion Research 2018. KEER 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 739. Springer, Singapore. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8612-0_91

H. Otsuji, K. Akahori, Searching for Changes in Cognitive Structure: Applying the KJ Method to STS Instruction. Journal of science education in Japan, 1993, 17(3), pp.133-143. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14935/jssej.17.133

M. Wang, N. Shaari, Y. He, Improving User Satisfaction with the E-Learning Platform Using KJ Method and Customer Journey Map in China, Journal of Creativity and Convergence, 2022, 2(2), pp. 57-69. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23021/JCC.20 22.2.2.57

P. Desmet, K. Overbeeke, S. Tax, Designing products with added emotional value: Development and appllcation of an approach for research through design. The design journal, 2001, 4(1), pp. 32-47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2752/14606920178937849 6

R. Verganti, C. Dell'Era, Design-driven innovation: meaning as a source of innovation, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199694945.0 13.006

R. Verganti, Design, meanings, and radical innovation: A metamodel and a research agenda. Journal of product innovation management, 2008, 25(5), pp. 436-456. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j. 1540-5885.2008.00313.x

K.Tschimmel, Design Thinking as an effective Toolkit for Innovation. In ISPIM Conference Proceedings (p. 1). The International Society for Professional Innovation Management (ISPIM), 2012. DOI: https://www.academia.edu/1906407/ Design_Thinking_as_an_effective_Toolkit_for_In novation

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.